Why is Obama AWOL on Iran?

John Hinderaker at PowerLine breaks down the possible reasons for Obama’s strange stance on the Iranian uprising (and the government crackdown about to intensify):
1) America is or has been evil, so it should do little or nothing in the world. (Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers, etc.)
2) Obama is just a cautious guy who avoids risk at all costs. (Iran is the pirate “crisis” writ large, with Obama silent until someone else steps up and does something.)
A variant of this theory is:
3) Obama has no idea what to do about Iran, and he knows it. (He remembers that a few years ago he was but an unknown state senator in Illinois.)
4) Obama is bold when it comes to domestic policy but considers anything that happens in a foreign country an unwelcome distraction. (His view of the Presidency is high on domestic policy and low on foreign policy.)
5) Obama can’t be in favor of democracy because Bush was for it. (Having been elected as the anti-Bush, he must remain so.)
Update: President Obama on Saturday called on the Iranian government to “stop all violent and unjust actions against its own people.”

One Response to “Why is Obama AWOL on Iran?”

  1. Erik Haugen June 20, 2009 at 8:18 pm #

    All of these might have some truth to them, but the reason repeated over and over by analysts is that if Obama were to say something, that would help Khamenei and Ahmadinejad because they could position this as a west vs us thing rather than a Iran vs. us thing. I’m not why the article ignores the standard explanation for this. By doing so, it feels like the author is going out of his way to attack straw men.

Leave a Reply:

Gravatar Image


(The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly and will never be shared.)

XHTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>



Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.