I said she wasn’t running for President, but clearly she is. The book tour is extremely well-timed, as her PAC needs to rake in $$ in 2010 and hit the ground running in 2011. Watch as she turns book interviews into observations on public policy and current events, replete with what sound like pre-tested sound bytes. Is it working? For now, maybe. Even negative op-eds sell books, and its amazing how strong some of the animosity is (Bob Scheiffer saying she “has no future in politics“; David Brooks saying “she is a joke“). Surely they go too far (folks like Scheiffer and Brooks spend their days surrounded by elites). That said, a title like “going rogue” is unlikely to help her gain serious consideration by a wide range of Americans.
Should she? Probably not. She has pockets of strong support, but also high negatives. She is simply not sufficiently knowledgeable on the issues in our day, and while her Reaganesque, common sense conservatism is winsome, she needs a greater depth of understanding and oratorical finesse to successfully extend her support base (the way Obama, for example, came from relative obscurity to electrify the Democratic party).
I see her as a force in the resurgent conservative movement, but not as the GOP nominee in 2012.
FREE SHIPPING!




I tend to agree with you- Palin shouldn’t run for president. But I don’t agree that her Reaganesque common sense conservatism is winsome. Ronald Reagan appealed to a broad base becuase he was pro small town and middle class, but ambivalent about large cities and mega corporations- if he didnt like them, he didnt say so. Palin on the other hand is also pro small towns and middle class, but she has a decidedly nasty streak about large cities and mega corps that’s particularly unappealing to conservatives in those places who find themselves attacked by one of their own. There’s nothing winsome about Palin and she’s not presidential material.