What’s wrong with the Senate health care bill?

Yuval Levin sums up why conservatives are still dead-set against it, but also why progressives like Howard Dean and Rolland Burris are now publicly opposed as well:

In essence, what’s left of the bill compels universal participation in a system that everyone agrees is a failure without reforming that system, and even exacerbates its foremost problem — the problem of exploding costs.

Read the whole thing. (You’ll also learn why you should have bought health insurance stocks a few months ago.)
HT: Power Line
In a poll conducted by NBC News/Wall Street Journal from December 11-14, just 32% say that President Obama’s health-reform plan is a good idea, and 47% oppose it. NBC’s Mark Murray writes: “In addition, for the first time in the survey, a plurality prefers the status quo to reform. By a 44-41 percent margin, respondents say it would be better to keep the current system than to pass Obama’s health plan.”

One Response to “What’s wrong with the Senate health care bill?”

  1. Erik Haugen December 18, 2009 at 6:28 pm #

    “But what is left of this bill … just subsidizes the existing system — which both sides agree is a failure.”
    This article seems to miss the main point – compulsory insurance addresses the problem faced by people with pre-existing conditions that can not get group coverage. (Rescission, etc)
    This is an absurd solution to a legitimate problem, but not even mentioning it in an analysis of the bill is probably not helpful.

Leave a Reply:

Gravatar Image


(The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly and will never be shared.)

XHTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>



Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.